It's Stupid Time

| | Comments (4)

this morning, i read the NYT online, as usual, and it hits me.

it's stupid time again!

with the presidential election in six weeks there is no hope for anything resembling intelligence in the news. nope. we are going to see article after article about whether or not george w. bush showed up for national guard service.

as if that matters AT ALL.

let's all take a nice gentle step back here people and remember:

it makes no difference at all.

a) national guard service during the vietnam war is as important as peanut vending during the world series.
b) it was thirty years ago.
c) squabbling about his attendance at fly-boy camp implies that it has some vague merit to begin with. it does not. whether or not you read all the little descriptive plaques at the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum is irrelevent during a discussion of who is an astronaut.
d) i do not fucking care who is a soldier to begin with. good for george for not going to fight during the vietnam war. even kerry admits it was a dumb fucking idea.

and kerry, get a life. "going to war is bad if you've gone to war but there's a reason to not go to war if the reason is real sometimes we go to war to fight but fighting is wrong if we can fight together i sure am brave."

yeah. right. i got a medal for you right here.

my sincerest regret is that this year i did not do what i did during the last presidential election, which is go to australia for a month. of course that backfired when two weeks post-election, the election still dragged on and i had all sorts of australians laughing at me. then i came home and we still weren't sure who the damn president was.

when i first decided to write about this national guard/election bullshit, i was thinking: making a stink about georgie skipping his drills would be akin to me not getting a promotion because i skipped my Great Books lectures freshman year of college.

yep. i only went to the first one and then didn't show up again until the final exam. why? because i didn't need to go. my going to Great Books lectures served as much purpose as georgie going to national guard drills.

we all know even if we did stay in the vietnam war, he would not have put his training to use overseas. he wasn't going to fight anything more strenuous then a hangover.

and now, i must admit, i'm having a hard time stomaching a vote for kerry. he's such a ponce. where's a politician with spine? where's a politician who will say what he or she believes rather than what the polls tell him mrs. o'cranky from crusted butt, colorado wants to hear?

while i'm griping about the state of the world... reading the sunday paper it seems like all across the world, people are going conservative.

in iran, the're rolling back women's rights.
in france, they're pining for the days of corporeal punishment in school.
in the american south, they're hoping for a war in israel so the messiah will come back.

i quote bill moyers: "… One estimate puts these people at about 15 percent of the electorate. Most are likely to vote Republican; they are part of the core of George W. Bush’s base support. He knows who they are and what they want. When the president asked Ariel Sharon to pull his tanks out of Jenin in 2002, more than one hundred thousand angry Christian fundamentalists barraged the White House with e-mails, and Mr. Bush never mentioned the matter again."

this is not what i want to be thinking about on monday morning.

i'd rather be thinking about the absolutely hysterical couple i met on friday night. or the nice new blinds we finally got around to hanging so we can get frisky in the living room. or the peach blackberry pie madhavi made yesterday.

oh. and the philadelphia orchestra is striking. that can't be good news for us here at the sf symphony.

wait. i will try to close with some good news. um. er. uh.

okay. on saturday night i called hippie bill and he said, "hey, you getting the boys together to play some yahtzee!?"

that's exactly what i was doing. that hippie bill is a goddamn precog.

4 Comments

eetraveling said:

i know you don't like talking about this stuff...but hey, you brought it up.

georgie's military record (or lack thereof) is an issue because he and his goons can't stop picking on kerry's record. this cocaine-snorting cheerleader is criticizing someone who a) actually served, which george himself is putting forward as a virtue, and then b) repudiated the war, along with the rest of america. i find those criticisms offensive, particularly coming from someone who relied on his connections and wealth to escape from the war.

do i think he should've gone to that war? no, no one should've. and if we have a draft for another unjust war, i will use any money and connections i can find to get potential soldiers whom i love out of harm's way. but it's exactly because people like bush are effectively exempt from service that our leaders are happy to wage war: their children can escape the consequences.

as for kerry's supposed flip-flopping, it sounds to me like you're the one who's been duped. please don't tell me you buy into the whole "kings (i mean presidents) should pick one opinion and keep promoting it no longer how wrong it might be!" even if kerry is trying to get some more votes, his dependence on the voters' whims is the fault of our two-party system, not kerry. given that system, i think getting kerry more votes is a worthy cause. at least he's listening to mrs. o'cranky instead of mr. o'christian-fundamentalist (who, as you point out, has a tremendous amount of sway with george).

think of your analogy this way: complaining about george skipping his drills is like complaining that you never studied literature, you lied about ever studying literature, you're auditioning for the job of choosing what everyone in the entire country will get to read, and you're criticizing your opponent for having skipped p. 167 of "crime and punishment" even though she read every other page of every other book ever published.

xz said:

right.

except instead of arguing about literature or guard service or who's a good soldier, what we're really interested in is none of those things -- rather what those things indicate about a person.

in the discussion of these things we have once again allowed the machine to suck us into caring about irrelevent details so we can be distracted from the truly important issues. and no, i don't think kerry's a waffler. i think he's a politician who voted for a war he didn't think was a good idea (or who voted to authorize force when he wasn't sure it was necessary, except politically) and who now doesn't have the balls to say "i made a mistake."

and the idea that all this back and forth is called for because georgie started it is depressing.

i think they're both losers. i don't think either even has a conception of what it means to really lead. i think that while george w. bush is a stooge of the worst kind, john kerry is a stooge of a yet to be proven kind. if he has his own ideas i'll be damned if i can hear them.

his big plan for fixing the disaster in iraq?

1) ask for help
2) train their soldiers
3) rebuild iraq
4) have elections in iraq

that's brilliant! why didn't anyone else think of those miraculous solutions! thank you kerry! you've got my vote!

sadly, he does.

s h a n o n said:

but i dont care about you missing the great books lecture because i don't hate you. i do however, hate george bush so i want to know about everything he's ever done wrong.

slim said:

politics are gay.

you are all john kerry

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by xz published on September 20, 2004 11:05 AM.

Things We Do Not Know was the previous entry in this blog.

Saturday is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01